[arch-general] Gnome3 and Gnome2

[Bernardo Barros]

2011/4/10 Nephyrin Zey <Nephyrin at doublezen.net>:
> Gnome 3 is, frankly, not ready yet. It's a bit like the original KDE4
> situation - it has promise, but also serious rough edges (20% CPU usage when
> moving the mouse, complete no-go with binary nvidia drivers, ...), and is
> lacking basic features gnome 2 had. (sensors applet, startup application
> management, multi-monitor, custom keybindings, ...).
>

I don't see those problems here. Gnome 3 is stable and does not
consume all that CPU here. Just a little more then kde. When I need
high performance I use openbox anyway.

The "problem" I see with this first release is the lack of features
and customization, but that will come with time I guess.