[arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

[Oon-Ee Ng]

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:50 AM, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Ionut Biru <ibiru at archlinux.org> wrote:
>> On 04/24/2011 11:28 PM, Arthur Titeica wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sunday 24 April 2011 20:49:49 Andreas Radke wrote:
>>>>
>>>> All file conflicts should now be solved. Please test the new soprano
>>>> pkg in testing and all the other redland/rasqal/raptor packages in
>>>> testing.
>>>
>>> Sorry if missed out something but soprano 2.6.0-3 still requires redland-
>>> compat. From your message I understand it should come with redland as
>>> dependency so that libreoffice wouldn't complain...
>>>
>>
>> you should do a pacman -Syu. now redland-compat doesn't conflict with
>> redland anymore and can be installed along with it.
>
> error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
> redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0 exists in filesystem
> redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0.0.0 exists in filesystem
> Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
>
> redland-1.0.13-1
> redland-compat-1.0.12-3
>
Should an upstream bug be filed? I'm pretty sure having the same
soname across different minor versions is a bug. I've already checked
the current librdf.org bug tracker, no such bug filed yet.