[arch-general] [WAS:arch-dev-public] raptor/rasqal/redland .so rebuilds moved to testing

[Oon-Ee Ng]

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Seblu <seblu at seblu.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Andreas Radke <a.radke at arcor.de> wrote:
>> Am Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:01:44 +0800
>> schrieb Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> > error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
>>> > redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0 exists in filesystem
>>> > redland: /usr/lib/librdf.so.0.0.0 exists in filesystem
>>> > Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
>>> >
>>> > redland-1.0.13-1
>>> > redland-compat-1.0.12-3
>>> >
>>> Should an upstream bug be filed? I'm pretty sure having the same
>>> soname across different minor versions is a bug. I've already checked
>>> the current librdf.org bug tracker, no such bug filed yet.
>>>
>>
>> You should probably do this. You may want to ask in the irc
>> channel before. I'm usually logged in there #redland.
>>
> Hello Andreas,
>
> A bug is already filled here : https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23919.
> If you need more precision, I'm at your service.
>
> Regards,
>
I believe he was talking about an upstream bug. A bug at
bugs.archlinux.org is for alerting Arch devs. Of course, Andreas is
already replying to this thread, so he IS aware.

@Andreas, I'll try to drop by the IRC channel soon. Its midnight here =).