[arch-general] Installation of libreoffice

Philipp Überbacher hollunder at lavabit.com
Wed Aug 3 10:17:00 EDT 2011


Excerpts from Auguste Pop's message of 2011-08-03 15:37:38 +0200:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Philipp Überbacher
> <hollunder at lavabit.com> wrote:
> > Excerpts from Auguste Pop's message of 2011-08-03 15:12:21 +0200:
> >> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Mauro Santos <registo.mailling at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On 03-08-2011 07:41, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >> I'm aware that recently there has been some changes in libreoffice
> >> >> package. The problem is that yesterday I updated my system and
> >> >> surprisingly only libreoffice-common was updated. By that I mean that
> >> >> I mean that not base, writer, impress... were available after the
> >> >> update, they dissapered. Moreover, if I make "pacman -S libreoffice"
> >> >> only  "libreoffice-common" is targeted and there is no traces of
> >> >> libreoffice-calc,  libreoffice-base,  libreoffice-draw.... The thing
> >> >> is that there seems to be a container called libreoffice which it is
> >> >> suppose to contain all this basic packages but in my case only
> >> >> installs "libreoffice-common". What I'm doing wrong? I hope it is not
> >> >> expected that we install one by one the components we want.
> >> >> Thanks in advance,
> >> >> Hector
> >> >
> >> > My only (small) gripe is that libreoffice-gnome maybe should be called
> >> > libreoffice-gtk.
> >> >
> >> > As a user of xfce I was slightly puzzled but the naming saying gnome as
> >> > it sort of implies that it is specific to gnome, however the description
> >> > clarifies that it applies to any gtk dependent DE. Maybe the naming
> >> > should be general and the description should state gnome,xfce and
> >> > anything else gtk dependent that is officially supported by arch.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Mauro Santos
> >> >
> >> and libreoffice-kde4 should be libreoffice-qt.
> >
> > I'm not sure about this, it pulls in at least phonon, which is kde
> > specific.
> >
> >
> oh, i didn't install that. that was a blind guess. :-P
> 
> best regards,

I didn't go through with it either but I had a look at what it would
pull. libreoffice-gnome pulls nothing on my system, no gconf, no other
gnome dependencies. libreoffice-kde pulls phonon and a bunch of other
kde dependencies.

So I'd suggest:
libreoffice-gnome -> libreoffice-gtk (version?)
libreoffice-kde4 (leave it)

It's not consistent but it reflects reality.



More information about the arch-general mailing list