[arch-general] partition sizes and filesystems (Re: Install Arch in stages?)
clemens fischer
ino-news at spotteswoode.dnsalias.org
Fri Dec 9 17:26:47 EST 2011
Leonid Isaev wrote:
> I think it's a better idea to have either /var/lib or entire /var on
> reiserfs.
>
> / ext4 30Gb
> /var ext4 10Gb
> /boot ext4 100Mb
> /var/lib reiserfs 500Mb
> /home ext4 85Gb
> /tmp ext2 2Gb
Interesting! Why do you think that? Me, I used my ears to determine
the best filesystem for my workloads on the PC. Ext4 is the one with
least head movement: the disks stay silent for long periods of time,
then they have hectic fits and go quiet again.
Compare this with freebsd's UFS2+soft-updates, XFS and JFS. I didn't
dare to use ZFS on freebsd and I think I never tried reiserfs, fearing
it isn't on active development currently.
Oh, one other thing: my swap and home partitions are LUKS encrypted.
The swap uses etc/crypttab with a random key, the key for home is on an
USB dongle, so I can physically lock out people taking possession of the
PC by keeping that dongle safely stashed away some place.
clemens
More information about the arch-general
mailing list