[arch-general] Using the new 'extramodules' directory in linux-* packages

Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.talk at gmail.com
Thu Dec 29 03:56:33 EST 2011


Thanks for the response, but please don't top-post =)

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Jonathan Vasquez
<jvasquez1011 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would go with either
>
> /lib/modules/extramodules/<kernel>/
>
> or
>
> /lib/modules/<kernel>/extramodules/
>
> But maybe this is just semantics and I'm just picky about directory
> structure.

To make it clear, I'm not asking about changing where 'extramodules'
goes, as that's up to the devs. I'm asking whether my package (and my
own scripts) should be using the 'general' extramodules folder (which
they would in the end no matter what).

Your first suggestion doesn't make sense because that would defeat the
purpose of having 'extramodules' in the first place (so minor kernel
version updates do not need rebuilding of modules). The second one is
currently symlinked to /lib/modules/extramodules-<kernel>


More information about the arch-general mailing list