[arch-general] vi dependency mailx - why not mailx-heirloom?
vodoo0904 at sonnenkinder.org
Thu Feb 17 16:15:04 EST 2011
At Donnerstag, 17. Februar 2011 21:30 David C. Rankin wrote:
> Just a quick question on the vi dependency of mailx. Why not mailx-
> provides a great deal more capability with attachments, and flexibility as a
> mailer. The issues is down in the noise, but why drive a pinto if you can
> a jag?
Okay, i'm not a dev, but mailx-heirloom provides mailx "provides=('mailx')" and
therefore all shoould be fine. I myself ask me more why there is not conflicts
array in the PKGBUILD of mailx-heirloom. :)
See you, Attila
More information about the arch-general