[arch-general] vi dependency mailx - why not mailx-heirloom?

[Attila]

At Donnerstag, 17. Februar 2011 21:30 David C. Rankin wrote:

>         Just a quick question on the vi dependency of mailx. Why not mailx-
heirloom? It
> provides a great deal more capability with attachments, and flexibility as a 
cli
> mailer. The issues is down in the noise, but why drive a pinto if you can 
drive
> a jag?

Okay, i'm not a dev, but mailx-heirloom provides mailx "provides=('mailx')" and 
therefore all shoould be fine. I myself ask me more why there is not conflicts 
array in the PKGBUILD of mailx-heirloom. :)

See you, Attila