[arch-general] Vuze doesn't work after update

Thomas Dziedzic gostrc at gmail.com
Sat Jan 15 11:03:10 EST 2011


On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Thomas Dziedzic <gostrc at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Madhurya Kakati <mkakati2805 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> HI,
>> I just updated Vuze bittorrent client to its latest version and now it
>> doesn't run. I am using 64 bit arch and openjdk6. The output when I
>> run vuze on the terminal is:
>>
>> $ vuze
>> Starting Azureus...
>> Suitable java version found [java = 1.6.0_20]
>> Configuring environment...
>> Java exec found in PATH. Verifying...
>> Browser check failed with: Cannot load 32-bit SWT libraries on 64-bit JVM
>> Auto-scanning for GRE/XULRunner.  You can skip this by appending the
>> GRE path to LD_LIBRARY_PATH and setting MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME.
>>  checking /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9.2 for GRE
>>        Can not use GRE from /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9.2 because
>> it's missing libxpcom.so.
>>  checking /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2 for GRE
>> GRE found at /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.
>> Browser check failed with: Could not initialize class
>> org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display
>> Can't create browser.  Will try to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH and hope Vuze
>> has better luck.
>> setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to: /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2
>> setting MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME to: /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2
>> Loading Azureus:
>> java -Xmx128m -cp "./Azureus2.jar:./swt.jar"
>> -Djava.library.path="/usr/share/vuze"
>> -Dazureus.install.path="/usr/share/vuze"
>> -Dazureus.script="/usr/bin/vuze" -Dazureus.script.version=2
>> org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main
>> file:/usr/share/vuze/Azureus2.jar ; file:/usr/share/vuze/swt.jar ;
>> file:/usr/share/vuze/
>> changeLocale: *Default Language* != English (United States). Searching
>> without country..
>> changeLocale: Searching for language English in *any* country..
>> changeLocale: no message properties for Locale 'English (United
>> States)' (en_US), using 'English (default)'
>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>>        at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
>>        at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
>>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
>>        at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:532)
>>        at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main.<init>(Main.java:114)
>>        at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.Main.main(Main.java:292)
>>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>>        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616)
>>        at com.aelitis.azureus.launcher.MainExecutor$1.run(MainExecutor.java:37)
>>        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636)
>> Caused by: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Cannot load 32-bit SWT
>> libraries on 64-bit JVM
>>        at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Library.loadLibrary(Library.java:197)
>>        at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Library.loadLibrary(Library.java:174)
>>        at org.eclipse.swt.internal.C.<clinit>(C.java:21)
>>        at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Converter.wcsToMbcs(Converter.java:63)
>>        at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Converter.wcsToMbcs(Converter.java:54)
>>        at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.<clinit>(Display.java:132)
>>        at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.mainwindow.SWTThread.<init>(SWTThread.java:84)
>>        at org.gudy.azureus2.ui.swt.mainwindow.SWTThread.createInstance(SWTThread.java:63)
>>        at com.aelitis.azureus.ui.swt.Initializer.<init>(Initializer.java:163)
>>        ... 12 more
>> Exit from Azureus complete
>> No shutdown tasks to do
>> Azureus TERMINATED.
>>
>
> This is a known issue:
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/22432
> FS#22432 - [vuze] 4.6 fails to start on x86_64
>
> What's interesting is that I can't find a 64bit version of vuze
> anymore like there was with the older version. and what's more
> interesting is that I downloaded the file on a 64bit computer and
> still got the 32bit version. Is this an upstream problem?
>

BTW, I would like to continue this discussion on the bug webpage, not
on the ml please. & thanks.


More information about the arch-general mailing list