[arch-general] wiki page for Building Trinity on Arch - You want it here or on the trinity site?

[Ng Oon-Ee]

On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 12:38 -0700, Thomas S Hatch wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Ray Rashif <schiv at archlinux.org> wrote:
> 
> > On 29 January 2011 01:20, David C. Rankin
> > <drankinatty at suddenlinkmail.com> wrote:
> > > Guys,
> > >
> > >        As I work through building the pkgbuilds for Trinity on Arch, I
> > have
> > > been keeping notes, etc. on what has to take place. I will put that
> > > information up on a wiki. My question to the Arch devs is "do you want it
> > > here on the Arch wiki, or do you want it over on the Trinity wiki?"
> > >
> > >        It doesn't matter to me. It makes more sense to have it here, but
> > > there has been so much rancor over 'kde3 is dead' that I don't want to go
> > to
> > > the effort here if somebody is just going to nix it.
> > >
> > >        For the interested, Trinity is no longer kde3. It is currently
> > > actively developed, and is moving to cmake and qt4. There are current
> > builds
> > > for Debian, Ubuntu and Slackware being maintained. My goal is to create a
> > > set of pkgbuilds for Arch (which will obviously take a bit of time). But
> > if
> > > I can get them working from the svn tree, it should be a great resource
> > for
> > > Arch.
> > >
> > >        So what say the powers that be? Do the wiki page here or at
> > Trinity?
> >
> > The wiki is for Arch-related documentation, so why not?
> >
> 
> Yes! wiki it up!

kde3 is only dead as long as noone maintains it. That's how Arch works,
after all. So yes, I think putting Trinity on the wiki is fine, and it
should/will only get nixed if it stops getting maintained.