[arch-general] virtualbox additions package naming

[Vic Demuzere]

On 19 July 2011 16:18, Magnus Therning <magnus at therning.org> wrote:
> I think that the guest/host terminology is rather well established, so
> maybe
>
> virtualbox-host-additions
> virtualbox-guest-additions
> virtualbox-guest-modules
>

I don't like this. It sounds as if the first package has additions for
the host, but it's just an iso containing additions for the guest. It
doesn't make sense to name it this way.

What about

virtualbox-additions
virtualbox-arch-additions
virtualbox-arch-modules

--
vic at demuzere.be :: http://vic.demuzere.be :: PGP: 0x6690CF94
My software never contains bugs, it just develops random features.