[arch-general] Re: pacman new generation
nsebrecht at piing.fr
Tue Nov 22 06:02:20 EST 2011
The 22/11/11, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebrecht at piing.fr> wrote:
> > OP raised one or two benefits of Haskell over shell scripting. He is
> > right even if it's somewhat partial: many of high-level languages have
> > very good advantages over shell scripting. I do think pacman could be
> > much better if rewritten in one of these languages.
> Isn't pacman written in C?
s/shell scripting/low-level progrmming languages like C/g
More information about the arch-general