[arch-general] SystemD poll

Geoff capsthorne at yahoo.co.uk
Sat Aug 18 07:03:55 EDT 2012


On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:11:58 +1000
John Briggs <johneb47 at optusnet.com.au> wrote:

<snipped wisdom>

As I have said in a previous post, I arrived in linux a little later than you,
but for much the same reasons. On "KISS" / "The Arch Way" / "Unix philosophy"
etc, it seems to me that here as in my own field (law), maxims make good
servants but poor masters.  Ultimately, every decision has to be evaluated as
good or bad in its own right.  In most cases the answer will be in terms of the
quality of the software engineering and I am more than happy to accept the
judgment of people much better qualified than I am to make it.  On the other
hand, at the highest level, engineering decisions in all fields, sadly and
inevitably, have a "political" dimension.  Is the supplier of this solution
trustworthy over the long term? Where does this leave us if x happens? What are
the implications of this choice for future choices? Engineers are not
necessarily any better qualified than the rest of us to get those calls right.

Geoff


More information about the arch-general mailing list