[arch-general] SystemD poll
Jayesh Badwaik
jayesh.badwaik90 at gmail.com
Sun Aug 19 09:41:12 EDT 2012
Quoted from [1]:
"The hardest thing about voting is determining when to do it. In
general, taking a vote should be very rare—a last resort for when all
other options have failed. Don't think of voting as a great way to
resolve debates. It isn't. It ends discussion, and thereby ends creative
thinking about the problem. As long as discussion continues, there is
the possibility that someone will come up with a new solution everyone
likes."
Considering that the topic is so so trivial as to the default settings,
it is stupid to have a vote on it. On the other side, ArchLinux
installation is so much customizable that except for people who are just
copy-pasting instructions from net without thinking, almost everyone
else can use initscripts.
And I believe, the first population will not bother anyway about their
init system. Not because the former population is not skilled enough,
anyone installing ArchLinux is skilled enough. But because, the fact
that they are satisfied with default options show that they are not
specifically worried about special needs.
The fact that a rescue/installation CD should always boot makes it
relevant that it should be widely supported. Systemd will be widely
supported (for better or for worse), and the corresponding effort to
install initscripts is very very small and developers time is valuable.
I think the debate of default is useless.
--
Cheers and Regards
Jayesh Badwaik
stop html mail | always bottom-post
www.asciiribbon.org | www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
[1] http://producingoss.com/en/consensus-democracy.html#when-to-vote
More information about the arch-general
mailing list