[arch-general] inotify and locate
Andrea Crotti
andrea.crotti.0 at gmail.com
Sun Feb 26 07:24:49 EST 2012
On 02/26/2012 12:18 PM, Raven wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:49:55 +0800, Andrea Crotti
> <andrea.crotti.0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It's a bit a shame that there isn't any default good indexing system
>> for Linux.
>> Now there is also a inotify implementation and tools to set up
>> watchers on the filesystem,
>> so why are we still mainly stuck with locate and the expensive updatedb?
>>
>> Are there other problems with the inotify approach maybe or just lack
>> of developer interest?
>
> Great idea, though I thought inotify doesn't suit this task. For
> updatedb, it should call inotify_watch for every file on the
> filesystem, that's quite inefficient.
>
> I think Linux's audit system could do this, though.
Well I don't mean to integrate directly updatedb and locate, I mean a
new tool that uses the inotify api.
The efficiency might be a problem sure, but if you filter well only on
the paths and the files that you
actually need I don't think it would be too bad, after all inotify is in
the kernel.
How would the audit system be better? And what do you mean exactly?
More information about the arch-general
mailing list