[arch-general] unionfs or aufs, available somewhere?

[Magnus Therning]

On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:59:19AM -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2012 8:51 AM, "Magnus Therning" <magnus at therning.org> wrote:
>>
>> Ouch, that sucks.  I'll just revert to making copies and wasting
>> space then :(
> 
> If performance isn't that enormously critical I've used FUSE based
> union file systems in the past with success ... it worked well for
> my needs.

Do you know if it works with `schroot` though?

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning                      OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 
email: magnus at therning.org   jabber: magnus at therning.org
twitter: magthe               http://therning.org/magnus

I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have
C++ in mind.
     -- Alan Kay
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20120103/c20b5e9d/attachment-0001.asc>