[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Signoff report for [testing]

[Ionut Biru]

On 01/12/2012 05:19 PM, José Ramón García wrote:
> On 01/12/2012 03:07 AM, Arch Website Notification wrote:
>>
>> * 4 known bad packages
>>
> What does this mean? What is a 'bad' package? Why doesn't the sign-off
> report say which packages are 'bad'? As a user of [testing] this has
> been bugging me, because I don't want to install 'bad' packages.

open a feature request.

those packages are not bad in the sense that you will end up with a non
booting system or data loses.

they have minor issues, like a missing module from kernel

-- 
Ionuț

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 554 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20120112/d312498a/attachment.asc>