[arch-general] lib32-xcb, libxcb, and xcb-proto newer than in repos?

[Oon-Ee Ng]

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Alexandre Ferrando <alferpal at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 January 2012 09:41, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Alexandre Ferrando <alferpal at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 25 January 2012 09:25, Oon-Ee Ng <ngoonee.talk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> :: Starting full system upgrade...
>>>> warning: lib32-libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than multilib (1.7-3)
>>>> warning: libxcb: local (1.8-1) is newer than extra (1.7-2)
>>>> warning: xcb-proto: local (1.7-1) is newer than extra (1.6-2)
>>>>
>>>> I thought it'd just be an outdated mirror or something, but a check on
>>>> archlinux.org searching for xcb shows that the latter versions are
>>>> current in the repos. Did something travel backward in time?
>>>
>>> Outdated mirror. This was something that got solved in Saturday.
>>
>> Why would the website show otherwise?
>>
>> http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=libxcb
>>
>> It shows 1.7-3 for lib32-libxcb and 1.7-2 for libxcb here for me.
>> Doubt my browser checks for /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist (hopefully).
>
> Because libxcb 1.8 was dropped. See [1]
>
> [1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2012-January/022433.html

Thanks, missed that. Sorry for the noise.