[arch-general] Kernel 3.2.1 woes

Norbert Zeh nzeh at cs.dal.ca
Wed Jan 25 07:11:51 EST 2012


Peter Lewis [2012.01.25 0919 +0000]:
> On Monday 23 Jan 2012 21:53:25 Norbert Zeh wrote:
> > Laptop/intel graphics: Boots/reboots/halts all fine, as long as I don't
> > suspend to RAM.  After suspend to RAM, screen backlight is on, but screen
> > remains black until turning the machine off.  Apart from the screen issue,
> > the machine seems to behave fine.
> 
> I get exactly the same behaviour on my laptop (Core i7, integrated Intel 
> graphics).
> 
> Did you figure it out?

It's a time-consuming process.  First result I got is that somewhere along the
way, a commit changed processor initialization after resuming.  It tries to
avoid some unnecessary work.  The problem is: with the "unnecessary work"
(before this commit) it worked; after it, I get a kernel panic.  Right now I
know a point in the commit sequence where I get a kernel panic and a point where
I get the black screen issue.  I don't know whether there was a stage in between
where there is no panic and no black screen.  I have about 300 commits left to
bisect, and I'll see whether I can finish bisecting this tonight (recompiling
and testing the kernel about log 300 = 9 times).

I don't have the expertise to fix this, but I want to know exactly where the bug
was introduced, in order to provide useful information in my bug report to the
kernel developers.  Overall, I have the feeling that the 3.2.X kernel line
introduced a number of regressions and is of much lower quality than the 3.1.X
line.  With 3.1.X, everything worked flawlessly.  In addition to my graphics
woes with 3.2.1, I also found that my intel wireless card starts misbehaving at
times with 3.2.1, which it never did/does with any of the 3.1.X kernels.

Cheers,
Norbert

-- 

()  ascii ribbon campaign  -  against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org    -  against proprietary attachments


More information about the arch-general mailing list