[arch-general] initscripts 20120631 and BTRFS

[Tom Gundersen]

On Jul 3, 2012 4:36 PM, "Arno Gaboury" <arnaud.gaboury at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> I refer to this bug report:
>
>> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30517
>
>
> I have exactly the same situation at boot, and this didn't happend before.

The bug report is about lvm, and your email appears to be about btrfs...
Seems some info is missing.

As to the bug report, it was just assigned to me, so I will sort it or
tonight (I hope).

Tom

> Form my kernel.log:
>
>
>
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373550] INFO: task
btrfs-transacti:353 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373554] "echo 0 >
/proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373557] btrfs-transacti D
ffff880402ae3b58     0   353      2 0x00000000
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373562]  ffff880402bc3c80
0000000000000046 ffff880402ae3790 ffff880402bc3fd8
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373568]  ffff880402bc3fd8
ffff880402bc3fd8 ffff880408daa7b0 ffff880402ae3790
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373580]  ffff88041f493740
0000000000013740 ffff880400000000 ffff880402bc3bc8
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373583] Call Trace:
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373590] [<ffffffff81013580>] ?
__switch_to+0x120/0x410
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373595] [<ffffffff81468b29>]
schedule+0x29/0x70
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373598] [<ffffffff81468df7>]
schedule_preempt_disabled+0x27/0x40
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373600] [<ffffffff814674a8>]
__mutex_lock_slowpath+0x148/0x340
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373603] [<ffffffff814676b6>]
mutex_lock+0x16/0x30
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373625] [<ffffffffa013d2bb>]
btrfs_run_ordered_operations+0x3b/0x210 [btrfs]
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373636] [<ffffffffa011d3a4>]
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x74/0xaa0 [btrfs]
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373646] [<ffffffffa011ca4c>] ?
join_transaction.isra.22+0x2dc/0x310 [btrfs]
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373650] [<ffffffff81073b60>] ?
abort_exclusive_wait+0xb0/0xb0
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373660] [<ffffffffa0115e25>]
transaction_kthread+0x235/0x2b0 [btrfs]
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373669] [<ffffffffa0115bf0>] ?
btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50 [btrfs]
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373671] [<ffffffff810731d3>]
kthread+0x93/0xa0
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373674] [<ffffffff8146bbe4>]
kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373677] [<ffffffff81073140>] ?
kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x70/0x70
>> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373680] [<ffffffff8146bbe0>] ?
gs_change+0x13/0x13
>
>
> Is it really a bug, or did I miss something or did something wrong?
>
> TY for any advise.