[arch-general] initscripts 20120631 and BTRFS

[arnaud gaboury]

Sorry for the wrong subject. I had an error at boot, same as the one
described. I remember adding settings about checking LVM2 at boot when I
set up my LVM group. Currently traveling, so can'r give you more details,
but I guess new iniscript broke something with LVM.
Regards

####Sent from my Galaxy S2 running Cyanogenmod 9#### Come and chat on
Googletalk
On Jul 3, 2012 7:06 PM, "Tom Gundersen" <teg at jklm.no> wrote:

> On Jul 3, 2012 4:36 PM, "Arno Gaboury" <arnaud.gaboury at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear list,
> >
> > I refer to this bug report:
> >
> >> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/30517
> >
> >
> > I have exactly the same situation at boot, and this didn't happend
> before.
>
> The bug report is about lvm, and your email appears to be about btrfs...
> Seems some info is missing.
>
> As to the bug report, it was just assigned to me, so I will sort it or
> tonight (I hope).
>
> Tom
>
> > Form my kernel.log:
> >
> >
> >
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [ 240.373550] INFO: task
> btrfs-transacti:353 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373554] "echo 0 >
> /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373557] btrfs-transacti D
> ffff880402ae3b58     0   353      2 0x00000000
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373562]  ffff880402bc3c80
> 0000000000000046 ffff880402ae3790 ffff880402bc3fd8
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373568]  ffff880402bc3fd8
> ffff880402bc3fd8 ffff880408daa7b0 ffff880402ae3790
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373580]  ffff88041f493740
> 0000000000013740 ffff880400000000 ffff880402bc3bc8
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373583] Call Trace:
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373590] [<ffffffff81013580>] ?
> __switch_to+0x120/0x410
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373595] [<ffffffff81468b29>]
> schedule+0x29/0x70
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373598] [<ffffffff81468df7>]
> schedule_preempt_disabled+0x27/0x40
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373600] [<ffffffff814674a8>]
> __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x148/0x340
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373603] [<ffffffff814676b6>]
> mutex_lock+0x16/0x30
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373625] [<ffffffffa013d2bb>]
> btrfs_run_ordered_operations+0x3b/0x210 [btrfs]
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373636] [<ffffffffa011d3a4>]
> btrfs_commit_transaction+0x74/0xaa0 [btrfs]
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373646] [<ffffffffa011ca4c>] ?
> join_transaction.isra.22+0x2dc/0x310 [btrfs]
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373650] [<ffffffff81073b60>] ?
> abort_exclusive_wait+0xb0/0xb0
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373660] [<ffffffffa0115e25>]
> transaction_kthread+0x235/0x2b0 [btrfs]
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373669] [<ffffffffa0115bf0>] ?
> btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50 [btrfs]
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373671] [<ffffffff810731d3>]
> kthread+0x93/0xa0
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373674] [<ffffffff8146bbe4>]
> kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373677] [<ffffffff81073140>] ?
> kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x70/0x70
> >> Jul  3 16:27:01 localhost kernel: [  240.373680] [<ffffffff8146bbe0>] ?
> gs_change+0x13/0x13
> >
> >
> > Is it really a bug, or did I miss something or did something wrong?
> >
> > TY for any advise.
>