[arch-general] Glibc 2.16.0-2 in testing killed my system.
Jan Steffens
jan.steffens at gmail.com
Sat Jul 7 11:47:57 EDT 2012
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Uli Armbruster
<uli.armbruster at googlemail.com> wrote:
> * Tom Gundersen <teg at jklm.no> [07.07.2012 15:55]:
>> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 3:42 PM, fredbezies <fredbezies at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I upgraded a few minutes ago my archlinux + testing installation. As I
>> > cannot install glibc (because of some AUR software which had links or
>> > binary in /lib), I made the mistake of forcing installation. My system
>> > is dead. I will try repairing using archboot on an USB key.
>>
>> This is expected behavior. It is good you mention this on the list, to
>> remind everyone that you should never use --force unless you really,
>> really know exactly what is going to happen.
>>
>> In this case glibc moved from /lib to /usr/lib. The upgrade should
>> have replaced /lib by a symlink to /usr/lib. This is necessary to make
>> the linker keep working. However, since you had some stuff from AUR
>> still in /lib this did not work. The correct solution would have been
>> to move that stuff out of the way, so that the upgrade could continue
>> normally.
>>
>> Since you used --force, however, pacman ignored the fact that the
>> symlink could not be created and basically hosed your system.
>>
>> It should be simple enough to fix though: mount your root from a
>> rescue system, empty /lib manually and replace it with a symlink to
>> /usr/lib. Assuming I guessed correctly at what exactly happened that
>> is.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Tom
>
> I have the same problem, but I didn't force the update :)
>
> Here's what pacman spits out
>
> :: Starting full system upgrade...
> resolving dependencies...
> looking for inter-conflicts...
>
> Targets (2):
>
> Name Old Version New Version Net Change Download Size
>
> glibc 2.16.0-1 2.16.0-2 0.00 MiB
> lib32-glibc 2.16.0-1 2.16.0-2 -0.18 MiB
>
> Total Installed Size: 51.95 MiB
> Net Upgrade Size: -0.19 MiB
>
> Proceed with installation? [Y/n]
> (2/2) checking package integrity [-------------------------------------] 100%
> (2/2) loading package files [-------------------------------------] 100%
> (2/2) checking for file conflicts [-------------------------------------] 100%
> error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
> glibc: /lib exists in filesystem
> Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.
>
>
> So, looks like there's AUR-stuff in /lib, but I also get the following
>
> # for i in /lib/*;do pacman -Qo $i;done
> /lib/ld-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 is owned by lib32-glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libBrokenLocale-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libBrokenLocale.so.1 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libSegFault.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libanl-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libanl.so.1 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libc-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libc.so.6 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libcidn-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libcidn.so.1 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libcrypt-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libcrypt.so.1 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libdl-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libdl.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libm-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libm.so.6 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libmemusage.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libnsl-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libnsl.so.1 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libnss_compat-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libnss_compat.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libnss_db-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libnss_db.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libnss_dns-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libnss_dns.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libnss_files-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libnss_files.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libnss_hesiod-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libnss_hesiod.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libnss_nis-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libnss_nis.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libnss_nisplus-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libnss_nisplus.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libpcprofile.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libpthread-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libpthread.so.0 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libresolv-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libresolv.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/librt-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/librt.so.1 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libthread_db-1.0.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libthread_db.so.1 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libutil-2.16.so is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
> /lib/libutil.so.1 is owned by glibc 2.16.0-1
>
> Is this caused by the fact that there are two packages with files in /lib ? How can I solve this problem? Is it ok this time to force the update?
>
> I _could_ remove lib32-glibc first, run the update and then reinstall my lib32 stuff, since I don't have much lib32 stuff installed. But I think for many people this isn't an option! That's why I'm asking here.
>
> Best
> Army
Updated lib32-glibc in [multilib-testing]. Just install glibc last.
$ pacman -Syu --ignore glibc
$ pacman -S glibc
More information about the arch-general
mailing list