[arch-general] Systemd : Analysis of reactions of Users

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 11:57 +0200, Dennis Herbrich wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:52:49AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 12:43 +0300, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Jayesh Badwaik
> > > <jayesh.badwaik90 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > With respect to daemons, the BEFORE and AFTER in the service files is
> > > > redundant and though not likely to cause errors, likely to be
> > > > inconsistent, because for every service file where a daemon "xyz" appears
> > > > in AFTER, the corresponding daemon must appear in BEFORE in the service
> > > > file for xyz. I am not quiet sure why this redundancy is there, you can
> > > > simply have just "AFTER" variables and they should take care of all the
> > > > dependencies I guess.
> > > 
> > > This is certainly not true – it is enough for /one/ unit to have
> > > Before or After.
> > 
> > Sorry, what kind of new logic philosophy/math do users need to learn?
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic Pardon, I only know the German Wiki,
> > since my English is broken.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redundancy
> 
> By the way, I, for one, am increasingly annoyed by (not only) your style of
> discussion.  Not that it'd matter in any way, but I miss the times of
> productive and helpful threads on this list.
> 
> HTH,
>   Dennis
> 

I don't claim to be an expert, I already mentioned that I'm a dummy. So
again: Is Linux in the future for experts only?