[arch-general] My end-user $0.02 on /etc/rc.conf splitting.

David Benfell benfell at parts-unknown.org
Sun Jul 29 01:20:40 EDT 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/28/2012 02:20 PM, Menachem Moystoviz wrote:
> 
> In sum, systemd offers some benefits that are covered by other 
> programs and patches, while drawing much controversy and exacting a
> toll which seems a bit too large in the eyes of some users. For
> this reason, while we should add compatibility for systemd, we
> shouldn't force it down the users throats.
> 
Having just survived the conversion to systemd, I would offer a few
comments:

1) I learned stuff on this list that didn't seem to have been
available in the documentation. And I still don't feel I really have a
mastery of systemd service files. My feeling is that the man pages and
the wiki could probably use more work.

2) It looks to me like there is some ugliness on logging. The Arch
wiki suggests a change to the syslog-ng configuration file so that
syslog-ng can work with the systemd journal. The trouble I'm having
with that is that--these are the examples I know about--apache2 and
postfix do not seem willing to log in a way that the systemd journal
can pick up; these daemons apparently will only log through the
traditional syslog-ng channel, and are not compatible with the new
socket. I actually kind of like journalctl (it has a -f option so you
can monitor it like you used to be able to do with tail -f
/var/log/everything.log), but you really now have to do multiple
commands to get everything that everything.log used to get.

3) The conversion to systemd was mostly a lot of work. It wasn't
rocket science, though as noted above, I still don't feel I fully
understand what's going on. Many, many packages, especially in the
AUR, do not yet have service files. This leads me to suspect that
there is at least as much angst among package maintainers about all
this as we've seen on this list.

- -- 
David Benfell
benfell at parts-unknown.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQFMgoAAoJELT202JKF+xplvYQAI6DcviIC2y69t2uhXmadn9X
2XYX+2YHbnM4OnAU2ysdj67bgcN2vKDQiT8GrAb+JQOphx8P0Y4NefkC1fMZUpzy
f8EMOIzRaHjfOJ4RKjM+eT9hM3Kg3qlroI9hIcEZM59UnCRMLL1qa8RMY58Bj0lV
oOBa4Y2MAi7wNJ0ZlLDnQEFGMNhME9sWaGXYV+VRgzjVUaxAz0/MetJum+Wz5YFv
QAHyOgSl14UeB1AeenMxZrS0SDSTVvLofXJRCkus5TqvJFJ9cEakHz2RNvN1Tyft
yEW/8vgPSFz160GOvGXVxmqSh0SrYWLUGhRWQ1dLd1j4PI6dB85Sh1u1Z8jVx7Z/
286o4HBvQHkSMALLDxmgdaltuxlKlOwEn/ZEkUB3tZHXWl3/WD8OtZ/EulUgl/DB
vOxWHFWFyt4MKU1tHqwP+UTqKI01y515+uARYmih7vQ2JsXyOXhd76nkgm13M7Pp
dTuYlQa9AKOQmyRKsMpYMqerdyo1wYflr8ZgE3vOjjCFFYYYOLXq8jePUcepivvv
vdf7Gk2GGHoZrNrBdd82SOaVRKMyKdKEJT5TB1rPf+eiQ3LHdxkJhHNsr9s59cux
oxo+CI/bM6Vn0HR4c1Q326aG/7gs0GQd4D6nx9uAhUhI2SDxxLVpitTPGLRjo51j
BJesYdSnVPX0cMbj4L3I
=+xYY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the arch-general mailing list