[arch-general] [cdrecord] Problems with original cdrecord on latest linux kernel
jdashiel at shellworld.net
Sun Jun 10 01:24:18 EDT 2012
Your drive could need cleaning, or have worn out, or in some way have
been disconnected. Those kind of drives have to be replaced every so
often. If it's a usb drive, have you done a modprobe usbmass yet? If
not, that may be all you need to get things going. If you read dmesg
does the cd drive even show up as a valid device now? If not, maybe
insmod usbmass will fix that and get you burning.
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> I've been using the original cdrecord (cdrtools) for more than 10
> years now, however I hadn't burned anything in the last 3 months (or
> even more). With the current linux kernel image from Arch:
> % uname -a
> Linux jvasquez14 3.3.8-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jun 5 15:20:32 CEST
> 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> I can't get cdrecord to recognize any cd/dvd writer, not the laptop
> one neither an external USB one... I might be mistaken, but with 3.0
> image I believe things worked (can't be sure, as I said I haven't been
> burning anything for months).
> When I try to identify the cd/dvd writers:
> % cdrecord -scanbus
> Cdrecord-ProDVD-ProBD-Clone 3.01a07 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
> Copyright (C) 1995-2012 Joerg Schilling
> cdrecord: No such file or directory. Cannot open '/dev/pg*'. Cannot
> open or use SCSI driver.
> cdrecord: For possible targets try 'cdrecord -scanbus'.
> cdrecord: For possible transport specifiers try 'cdrecord dev=help'.
> I looked through google, but the responses I get are pretty old, some
> from 2004, talking about early 2.6 kernels... I found one page (an
> old one as well) that suggests using ide-scsi emulation, but that
> seems to me old as well:
> Besides for quiet a while we don't get hdc or sdc, just plain sr0/sr1
> (even the scd0/scd1 was removed), and that seemed to work before if
> I'm not mistaken... Perhaps now the way is "sr0=scsi"?
> Any ways, maybe someone knows better, :-) I can try the boot loading
> thing, but before, I wanted to see if someone has experienced this,
> and there's a known work around.
More information about the arch-general