[arch-general] Pacman behaviour comparing numerical versions for package upgrades

Florian Pritz bluewind at xinu.at
Fri Jun 29 02:35:11 EDT 2012

On 29.06.2012 07:50, Myra Nelson wrote:
> The developer changed his numbering scheme after 1.5000
> to 1.51.

In that case you should add epoch=1 to the PKGBUILD.

Florian Pritz

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20120629/904b7e78/attachment.asc>

More information about the arch-general mailing list