[arch-general] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:RFC: OpenRC as init system for Arch
Kevin Chadwick
ma1l1ists at yahoo.co.uk
Wed May 9 08:20:04 EDT 2012
On Wed, 9 May 2012 13:57:14 +0200
Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
> The way used to handle conditions is wrong. And I admit that for /this/
> particular case, this is not much relevant.
>
I actually prefer the first case with multiple ifs. It helps newbie
techs dive in and read the code. So what if they break it they will
learn fixing it.
> > There's another point, shell is easily editable and understandable and
> > that's a good thing and not a bad one and also one of arches values I
> > believe, hence pacman uses so much shell!
>
> I don't find pacman much editable, sorry. I've given examples of nice
> features not easy to implement, here in the past. ,-p
There are a lot of functions and files to get a handle on
aren't there. Is that the reason? I don't think that detracts from the
point though?
More information about the arch-general
mailing list