[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] testing/systemd 191-1 failed to boot

[P .NIKOLIC]

On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 12:42:17 -0400
Loui Chang <louipc.ist at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat 22 Sep 2012 15:06 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> > Am 22.09.2012 10:07, schrieb Heiko Baums:
> > > Am Sat, 22 Sep 2012 15:09:02 +0900
> > > schrieb Zhengyu Xu <xzy3186 at gmail.com>:
> > > 
> > >> After updating systemd to 191-1 in testing repo, I had following
> > >> messages during booting and the process was stuck (crashed).
> > >>
> > >> [   10.539416] systemd[1]: segfault at 7d ip b75a97b7 sp bfb0ece8
> > >> error 4 in libc-2.16.so[b752a000+1a4000]
> > >> [   10.539700] systemd[1]: Caught <SEGV>, core dump failed.
> > >>
> > >> Downgrade to 189-4 can solve this problem. I want to know if this
> > >> is a personal problem or a general bug affecting others as well.
> > > 
> > > Why am I not surprised?
> > > 
> > > Yes, binary init system is so much better than a script based init
> > > system. And Poetterix is so damn good, so advanced, such an
> > > evolution and so much better than the common and over 40 years
> > > well tested sysvinit.
> > > 
> > > Come on systemd fanboys, here you have the first example. There's
> > > more to come. I'll get my popcorn.
> > 
> > After the recent outbreaks, we have been discussing banning people
> > from arch-general. At the time, the people we talked about had
> > calmed down and everything went back to normal, so there was no
> > point in going forward with it. However, your name just made top of
> > the list.
> > 
> > If I see you interrupting one more technical discussion with trolls
> > and flames, you will be banned indefinitely without further notice.
> > I will not see another one week flamewar on this list.
> > 
> > You are a grown man (at least you look like one), so you should know
> > that this kind of post adds nothing to the discussion, but starts
> > yet another flamewar. Start acting like a grown man and keep it to
> > yourself, unless you have something to say that's worth saying.
> > 
> > I am completely against banning people, but at this point, it is
> > either banning people or shutting down this list entirely.
> 
> I would petition that he be fully banned from all arch lists, forum,
> irc, etc.
> 

dev/nulled.



-- 
Linux 7-of-9 3.5.4-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Sep 15 08:12:04 CEST 2012
x86_64 GNU/Linux