[arch-general] Upstream urls and package descriptions

[Thomas Bächler]

Am 01.08.2013 18:02, schrieb Karol Blazewicz:
> Upstream urls:
> I found that dozens of packages in the repos have an upstream url that
> prints 'Page Not Found' in one way or another. Should I open bug
> reports for these packages or does nobody care about it? I could also
> check if the source is still available. If opening bug reports is OK,
> should I limit creating the reports to e.g. 10 a day?
> If I find a url that works, I will include it as a suggestion for the
> maintainer.

Creating bug reports is the way to go here. It actually doesn't matter
how many you create, the maintainers will fix them when they fix them.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 901 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20130801/267a9b82/attachment-0001.asc>