[arch-general] Why not mksh provides("ksh")?

[G. Richard Bellamy]

Not sure if this is the correct venue for this comment, and apologies
if it's already been mentioned, but why wouldn't mksh [1] provide ksh?

This would alleviate some AUR dependency weirdness, specifically with
the oracle-sqldeveloper [2] package, which currently forces an install
of ksh [3], even though it'll work just fine with mksh.

-rb

[1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/mksh/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/oracle-sqldeveloper/
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ksh/