[arch-general] gnupg 2.1 not stable

[Doug Newgard]

On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 14:19:09 -0500
Ido Rosen <ido at kernel.org> wrote:
> The correct response is indeed for users to panic and demand that Arch
> devs be more responsible about reading release notes before upgrading
> such important core components of the system.

LOL, are you serious? Do you know how long Arch operated without
package signing? You now expect users to panic?

You're taking this way, way to far.