[arch-general] archlinux samba provision error

[shadrock uhuru]

hello Marc
thanks for your help
there are only the two mount points as shown in my fstab file,
everything is mounted under root except for the home directory.
i carried out the test on the os_requirements page to test the filesystem,
the test returned outputs as shown on the page,
there were no "Operation not supported" errors so i assume the kernel is
configured correctly and the filesystem is mounted with the correct
options.


On 07/07/14 21:40, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can you please check
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/OS_Requirements
>
>> Ensure that your kernel has the following options enabled:
>>
>> CONFIG_EXT4_FS_XATTR=y
>> CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY=y
>> CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
>
>
>
>
> Am 07.07.2014 20:39, schrieb shadrock uhuru:
>> which gives me the following error output :-
>>
>> ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed -
>> ProvisioningError:
>> Your filesystem or build does not support posix ACLs, which s3fs requires.
>> Try the mounting the filesystem with the 'acl' option.
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/domain.py", line
>> 398, in run
>>     use_rfc2307=use_rfc2307, skip_sysvolacl=False)
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py",
>> line 2052, in provision
>>     raise ProvisioningError("Your filesystem or build does not support
>> posix ACLs, which s3fs requires.  Try the mounting the filesystem with
>> the 'acl' option.").
>>
>> this my fstab file.
>>
>> cat /etc/fstab
>> # /dev/sda1
>> UUID=6d501e92-b7be-4885-b6ce-4facd647623e    /             ext4         
>> rw,relatime,data=ordered,acl,user_xattr,barrier=1    0 1
>>
>> # /dev/sda2
>> UUID=fa951f67-d09c-412e-8d8a-07020863e3f0    /home         ext4         
>> rw,relatime,data=ordered,acl,user_xattr,barrier=1    0 2
>
>
> Would your SysVol share be one of this two partitions? Per default it
> goes to /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/. Are you sure, that /usr or a
> subdirectory isn't on a separate mountpoint?
>
>
> Regards,
> Marc