[arch-general] inetutils and the 'base' group

Leonid Isaev lisaev at umail.iu.edu
Mon Jun 16 19:35:10 EDT 2014


Hi,

	Is there a reason why core/inetutils is in base group, i.e. which
packages implicitly rely on it? It was added to base around Aug. 2011 ago, I
think because of hostname(1), but shouldn't this functionality be now provided
by hostnamectl?

Thanks,
-- 
Leonid Isaev
GPG fingerprints: DA92 034D B4A8 EC51 7EA6  20DF 9291 EE8A 043C B8C4
                  C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE  775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20140616/4264add7/attachment.asc>


More information about the arch-general mailing list