[arch-general] [answered (solved)] Why doesn't the evolution package version follow the stable release version from upstream?

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:59 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:57 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 16:48 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote:
> > > On 25/06/14 04:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > > Why is the Evolution package in extra evolution 3.12.3-1,
> > > > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/evolution/ , when the
> > > > current stable version from upstream still is 3.12.2?
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 20:07 +0100, at evolution-list at gnome.org Patrick
> > > > O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > >> the latest stable release currently being 3.12.2
> > > > 
> > > > "The latest stable release tarballs were uploaded on May 12, 2014:
> > > > 
> > > > evolution-3.12.2.tar.xz (NEWS)
> > > > evolution-data-server-3.12.2.tar.xz (NEWS)" -
> > > > https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evolution#Get_the_Source_Code
> > > 
> > > The wiki page wasn't updated for the latest stable release:
> > > 
> > > https://download.gnome.org/sources/evolution/3.12/
> > > 
> > > The tags in the Git repositories are the best source of information, not
> > > the wiki documentation.
> > 
> > IIUC this doesn't mean that it's the current stable version.
> > "LATEST-IS-3.13.3 23-Jun-2014 07:15" -
> > https://download.gnome.org/sources/evolution/3.13/
> > 
> > IIUC 3.13.2 is the official stable release from upstream.
>       3.12.2 pardon a typo, ...12..., not ...13... .

Seems to be 3.12.3 and not 3.12.2.
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2014-June/msg00163.html