mrugiero at gmail.com
Wed Mar 5 16:30:31 EST 2014
I agree, arnaud. The thing is, netctl is an Arch specific that exists since
before networkd was even a plan, IIRC. I don't know what will happen in the
end, but I'm always inclined to prefer an upstream solution, so my guess is
Arch will do the same.
2014-03-05 18:27 GMT-03:00 arnaud gaboury <arnaud.gaboury at gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Mario Rugiero <mrugiero at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Daniel is right. netctl and systemd-networkd are two different things.
> Yes, for sure. Let's take a bet : netctl will one day be "obsoleted",
> no upstream, and replaced entirely by networl at .service and networkd.
> Want to bet ? These two services are at some point doing the same things.
More information about the arch-general