[arch-general] bridge with netctl
arnaud.gaboury at gmail.com
Thu Mar 6 10:14:19 EST 2014
> This configuration make no sense whatsoever.
> 1) You create a bridge with no ports. What purpose does it serve?
> 2) If you want to add enp7s0 as a port, why do you have a configuration
> for enp7s0? If an interface is a bridge port, it cannot be used for IP
> traffic, so assigning it an IP is pointless.
If I understand correctly, in fact I took the set up upside down. I
tried br0 ---> enp7s0 when in fact the scheme is
|-----> dev 1
enp7s0 ----> bridge br0 ----|
|------> dev 2
Am I correct in this scheme?
More information about the arch-general