[arch-general] A good time to switch to dash as /bin/sh?
lisaev at umail.iu.edu
Thu Sep 25 18:06:12 EDT 2014
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 05:37:57AM +0800, lolilolicon wrote:
> With the disclosure of the new bash bug (CVE-2014-6271, CVE-2014-7169),
> it seems timely to bring this up.
> Dan added dash to core/base around seven years ago , intending the
> eventually link /bin/sh to dash instead of bash.
>  https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-November/003053.html
> We didn't make the switch, supposedly due to the bashism in our scripts
> which had a #!/bin/sh shebang line?
> Seven years passed.
> Is there anything preventing us from making the switch from bash to dash
> as /bin/sh now? We can then have dash provide sh instead.
Yes -- due to the same reasons. Also, I don't understand what the switch has to
do with the CVEs? If they are found -- good; if promptly fixed -- great. At the
very least this means that people are looking at the code... Has anyone proven
a theorem saying that no such bugs exist in dash (zsh, ksh, etc.)?
GPG fingerprints: DA92 034D B4A8 EC51 7EA6 20DF 9291 EE8A 043C B8C4
C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the arch-general