[arch-general] pacman's "Depends On"
wifiextender at bitmessage.ch
Thu Apr 23 19:01:21 UTC 2015
On 23/04/15 at 04:18pm, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>if a dedicated version of a dependency is needed, some packages
>mention it, others don't.
>Firefox does not explicitly mention a version of libvpx
>$ pacman -Si firefox | grep On
>Depends On : [snip] libvpx [snip]
>but it needs a dedicated version
>XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/lib/firefox/libxul.so:
>libvpx.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>Couldn't load XPCOM.
>ffmpeg does mentions that a dedicated version is needed
>$ pacman -Si ffmpeg | grep On
>Depends On : [snip] libvpx.so=2-64 [snip]
>IMO official packages should mention dedicated versions, since for
>users of a rolling release, there sometimes are good reasons to
>I tried to build Firefox from ABS against the outdated version of libvpx
>that is needed and installed on my system, but that's another issue.
>Perhaps other packages are broken too and I get aware of it, at an
>How can I figure out what packages depend on a dedicated version of
Maybe you should specify which packages to be ignored via 'IgnorePkg'
variable, here is the link
More information about the arch-general