[arch-general] [OT?] Which is most future-proof desktop environment?

[Magnus Therning]

Ralf Mardorf writes:

> IIRC, I won't read the thread again, all the mentioned WMs and DEs have
> a past and most likely a future. You might have noticed another thread,
> "plasma 5 crashing". The bloated DEs, especially GNOME and KDE do not
> provide a steady work-flow. New major releases often are released before

What is a "steady work-flow"?

> they are stable, but again, even if those releases would be stable,
> the way they work changes and breaks the work-flow. I don't know if a

More generally, what do you mean by "work-flow", and how have DEs like
KDE and Gnome broken "the work-flow" in the past?

/M

--
Magnus Therning              OpenPGP: 0x927912051716CE39
email: magnus at therning.org   jabber: magnus at therning.org
twitter: magthe               http://therning.org/magnus

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety
     -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 800 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20151230/b76d710e/attachment.asc>