[arch-general] postgresql 9.3 -> 9.4
mysatyre at gmail.com
Thu Jan 29 13:24:01 UTC 2015
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Bardur Arantsson <spam at scientician.net> wrote:
> On 01/29/2015 01:00 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Martti Kühne <mysatyre at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> You could also write a pacman wrapper that interferes with pacman's
>>> execution upon specific output.
> (Doesn't scale to more than one user since nobody else is going to be
> using that script.)
>>> Then you could have loud warning signals, send emails that get you
>>> fired and an automatic backup to the NSA, or NAS, as you like.
>> To correct myself: It's silly to assume the package that breaks your
>> setup is already on that watchlist. There's only one thing you can do:
>> make sure you have the time to clean up after your update.
> Uh, there's a difference between
> a) We *know* that upgrade X will break your system and/or
> require manual intervention.
> b) We have no specific knowledge that upgrade X will
> break your system and/or require manual intervention.
So, my script doesn't scale and your notion of 'we' does?
More information about the arch-general