[arch-general] current flash vulnerabilities - what to do?

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:30:05 -0400, Daniel Micay wrote:
>The Tor browser is quite insecure. It's nearly the same thing as
>Firefox, so it falls near the bottom of the list when it comes to
>browser security, i.e. below even Internet Explorer, which has a basic
>sandbox (but not nearly on par with Chromium, especially on Linux) and
>other JIT / allocator hardening features not present at all in Firefox.
>What the Tor browser *does* have that's unique are tweaks to
>significantly reduce the browser's unique fingerprint.
>
>https://blog.torproject.org/blog/isec-partners-conducts-tor-browser-hardening-study
>
>Tor would be a fork of Chromium if they were starting again today with
>a large team. They don't have the resources to switch browsers. That
>would only change if they can get Google to implement most of the
>features they need.

Vivaldi is based on Chromium. How does Vivaldi compare regarding
security and privacy to IceCat, Pale Moon, Firefox, QupZilla, Opera?

https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/?O=0&K=vivaldi
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?O=0&K=vivaldi