[arch-general] arch-general Digest, Vol 142, Issue 24
info at itwrx.org
Fri Aug 19 15:17:34 UTC 2016
On 08/18/2016 08:49 PM, arch-general-request at archlinux.org wrote:
> Send arch-general mailing list submissions to
> arch-general at archlinux.org
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> arch-general-request at archlinux.org
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> arch-general-owner at archlinux.org
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of arch-general digest..."
> Today's Topics:
> 1. Opinions on PowerShell? (Hunter Connelly)
> 2. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Kyle Terrien)
> 3. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Eli Schwartz)
> 4. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Kyle Terrien)
> 5. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Hunter Connelly)
> 6. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Eli Schwartz)
> 7. Re: Opinions on PowerShell? (Eli Schwartz)
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:30:27 -0400
> From: Hunter Connelly <blueblur112198 at gmail.com>
> To: arch-general at archlinux.org
> Subject: [arch-general] Opinions on PowerShell?
> Message-ID: <20160818233015.GA27297 at Hunters-Laptop.fios-router.home>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Recently, Microsoft released the source code for PowerShell under the MIT license.
> Here's the link for that.
> I was wondering what you guys thought about it.
> Specifically, if any of you will be using it, if you think it should be in the main repos, what this might mean for the future, etc.
Nothing personal to the OP(maybe this wasn't intentional flamebait), but
I, myself, don't want to hear "news"/propaganda about MS open source
trapware in an Arch Linux mailing list or anywhere else for that matter.
I see it's been uploaded it to aur. great. I won't be using it or voting
for it's inclusion in official repos. I'll refrain from responding to
"what this might mean for the future".
More information about the arch-general