[arch-general] Alternative init system proposal
gsnijders at gmail.com
Tue Feb 9 17:22:21 UTC 2016
Op 9 feb. 2016 17:52 schreef "Damjan Georgievski" <gdamjan at gmail.com>:
> On 9 February 2016 at 17:34, Guus Snijders <gsnijders at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Op 9 feb. 2016 17:27 schreef "Michał Zegan" <webczat_200 at poczta.onet.pl
> >> Although you have to write
> >> unit files, you can start scripts, so you do not really lose
> >> flexibility. Also systemd's isolation capabilities are superior, there
> >> are some things you currently cannot do from scripts, like
> >> PrivateTmp=yes and stuff.
> > Isolation is AFAIK based on cgroups, not the easiest subject, but
> > not impossible to implement.
> not impossible, if you reimplement systemd :)
> > PrivateTmp: Does that more then setting $TEMP to a custom value?
> > I'm just being curious here.
> yes, it creates a filesystem/mount namespace for the process(es) and
> /tmp/systemd-private-xxxx/ directory as /tmp. from the point of view
> of the process it will never see
> anything else from the outer /tmp
Ok, that is a nice trick.
Mvg, Guus Snijders
More information about the arch-general