[arch-general] Announcing pacpak

[Jelle van der Waa]

On 07/10/16 at 01:59pm, LoneVVolf wrote:
> IF flatpak is to become supported on AL, i'd prefer pacman to handle it
> instead of a separate application.

flatpak is packaged in [extra], which for me means that it is indeed
supported.

> 
> My personal preference though is for AL community to treat flatpak similar
> as derivative distros.

Huh? I'd say we support running flatpak's, but obviously not what runs
in the flatpak :-)

> 
> something like : flatpak is unsupported on Arch linux, ask the flatpak
> creator(s) for help.

-- 
Jelle van der Waa
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20160710/c391ccaa/attachment.asc>