[arch-general] Announcing pacpak

Mon Jul 11 16:57:38 UTC 2016

On 07/11/2016 05:01 PM, Maxwell Anselm via arch-general wrote:
> I think the tool is great Florian, but I do not think that it warrants
> official support. Consider examples like pacgem or pip2pkgbuild. These
> tools help integrate Ruby/Python packages (which are usually managed via a
> separate package manager) into pacman. They are great for users who want
> pacman to be the single package manager for their entire system, but they
> are still just AUR packages without official support.
> 

I agree. This is a reasonable argument at least until Flatpak becomes
much more popular. I will set it up elsewhere.

Regards,
Florian Pelz

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20160711/9b4afa4f/attachment.asc>