[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] signoffs are dead

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 19:28:10 -0700, Kyle Terrien via arch-general wrote:
>I have personally experienced several breakages in the past several
>months--more than usual.  A few were big enough that simply running
>'foo - --version' should have revealed a problem (i.e.  linking
>problems). A signoff process would have very likely caught these
>problems.

Could you provide some examples, by linking to the bug reports?

Excepted of issues that happen, if upstream decides to make a change of
course, as e.g. gtk or qt did, I couldn't notice more issues as usual.

Regards,
Ralf