[arch-general] valgrind - memory exclusion files on the fritz?

David C. Rankin drankinatty at suddenlinkmail.com
Thu Nov 24 00:45:55 UTC 2016


On 11/23/2016 08:49 AM, Chi-Hsuan Yen via arch-general wrote:
> As far as I know it's impossible (yet) to skip specific functions in
> memory usage counters. Only memory leak reports can be filtered. And
> things may be different on SuSE and Arch as they ship with different
> glibc versions and/or patches.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Yen, Chi-Hsuan

I have a couple of old arch boxes I cranked up just to test:

$ uname -a
Linux providence 3.5.3-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Aug 26 08:15:06 UTC 2012 i686
GNU/Linux

$ valgrind ./bin/valgrindchk
==7060== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==7060== Copyright (C) 2002-2013, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==7060== Using Valgrind-3.10.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==7060== Command: ./bin/valgrindchk
==7060==
 s : 0123456789
==7060==
==7060== HEAP SUMMARY:
==7060==     in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==7060==   total heap usage: 1 allocs, 1 frees, 11 bytes allocated
==7060==
==7060== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
==7060==
==7060== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==7060== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)

and a second old arch box:

$ uname -a
Linux nirvana 3.4.6-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Jul 20 08:21:26 CEST 2012 x86_64
GNU/Linux

$ valgrind ./bin/valgrindchk
==3481== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==3481== Copyright (C) 2002-2013, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==3481== Using Valgrind-3.10.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==3481== Command: ./bin/valgrindchk
==3481==
 s : 0123456789
==3481==
==3481== HEAP SUMMARY:
==3481==     in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==3481==   total heap usage: 1 allocs, 1 frees, 11 bytes allocated
==3481==
==3481== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
==3481==
==3481== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==3481== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 1 from 1)

  Both boxes show the correct valgrind behavior. So sometime (I don't know
when), something has changed in the way valgrind is packaged or patched. I
have some old ABS backups I'll take a look at and see if anything is apparent.

  The whole reason this jumped out at me is I know this used to work correctly
on Arch which incorporated the proper exclusion files up to at least valgrind
3.10-0 as shown above.

-- 
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.


More information about the arch-general mailing list