[arch-general] bitcoin-qt out-of-date

[Diego Viola]

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:08 PM, D C via arch-general
<arch-general at archlinux.org> wrote:
> Some people don't get the concept of volunteering lol.
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Jeroen Mathon via arch-general <
> arch-general at archlinux.org> wrote:
>
>> Some people have projects, or other things that take priority, if you have
>> a problem then get the git version from the AUR
>>
>> On Thu, 1 Sep 2016, 18:01 Diego Viola via arch-general, <
>> arch-general at archlinux.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Doug Newgard <scimmia at archlinux.info>
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:42:24 -0300
>> > > Diego Viola via arch-general <arch-general at archlinux.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hello,
>> > >>
>> > >> I flagged this package 10 days ago as out of date and I've been trying
>> > >> to contact the maintainer about it, with no response.
>> > >>
>> > >> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/bitcoin-qt/
>> > >>
>> > >> Is there any problem with updating this? Any reasons for the delay or
>> > >> lack of response?
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks,
>> > >> Diego
>> > >
>> > > Oh no, 10 days.
>> > >
>> > > Seriously?
>> >
>> > Other packages get updated much quicker, are you just going to put the
>> > blame the users on this one too?
>> >
>> > Diego
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> mQENBFOa9oMBCACc0vf5MZEKqfyCWw3foRhYqM3zL9zmIuDpLxGZ11BM6dLvTKVG
> xets5b2RZX+aPUbASnLFZWqANW2d5K+O7PNkvwKk7jJGu951WQkd1HGNHqQekb3Y
> SC6AOIt5G4Iu3xuJdbh8vuSU0tRIU3YVKSIWFCxgdTWO3XukgNYB1ncl39x4VGPh
> OsQ8ErsLfVMCwO7q4eTTv89HQZEzvCI+BhMlw0bjViBeMe+4ZfYuiFJp9SyZBcTY
> rVkdnn5gVOeqhU1eAk4uieG1t/anGm3GQ6NVDnh/+k6in6SwSZ2jAUXQluCMmyNA
> aCOCz7G4kytg8qel3VvT4YuI7hFQxcg17DMnABEBAAG0HURvcmlhbiA8Y2FtZW5z
> Y2hpY0BnbWFpbC5jb20+iQE/BBMBAgApBQJTmvaDAhsDBQkFo5qABwsJCAcDAgEG
> FQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQugwP0JaXCVNyvAf/Z9gAtGh4SSxNv0/CWFxL
> d5P6ikr8qGD9sVuH1QZa90zigmhAngfQyMF0DuPVnRTcVu0pwFObkvdI0/11UaSj
> Rdst9sPFV5b4wfLfGw4MinO9vTD7RQoLisnggaroNk98I894lvgtVWECxHYdPnW+
> VJWNONAfTOUjfqPVV7B2A35N4DxkgBM0VNdqpcd0Qj6acEaGRcGBlQUyssy+NYEr
> 5+nS9c58eM9wqxkcaWy2axrX2vvQth5PedGjZl53gsR3cSWLpFmyryyyVi2da4rv
> IFLdhZaZfWyRG7y0MTnPdi8NRwBO33r2UX0W+BC8VvGBjob17EgCZT06QHGzAs9F
> fLkBDQRTmvaDAQgA2p9RwuEWF16nWkc+z/5Vu6KlQh9paxw1zEHlmC+r103tWby8
> 27BLocuD7hKqcweuu17HL0LW1iSYfhr/iXDOTiJ5LsKXtBMYAVXbhamLKNOuHTO1
> qFdA55f6vtY/eMdWQ8qM+q31cLX0WYiQdsGonuIzqeIXETnmq9rx7fRaxpvv6K4Y
> 0u9N1NFwrpz2eOuIX/KFicoZs1tGID5OjnL2QB897za8i56oKjHFwNzZCndESc3h
> 78HXNzu7XMjRQHN8QvwybpWhtDanLd/3ZFvHMViZT9Zo2KAMsCgPNkqDe9SXrrEC
> vEYgZn0QO3Akrk1FmmzCCgMzP3F9l3czBNK7mwARAQABiQElBBgBAgAPBQJTmvaD
> AhsMBQkFo5qAAAoJELoMD9CWlwlTfKQH/2UsN6WgoyMGgRFm+INdAT8/ew4r30l5
> mTMKuAfpLs9lbIfeRJoq2+HtKsv8MNzYYCR595tdI9kTijhD0RKKhEfacBLIZFvZ
> 0j5SLaR+PC7Ky+KAIXIIZnrHsFAQR21Hup0POxuWeuvs0pfcFWTnNEb6cZHzTP7J
> YnUA/khgamUK/uWWymKxOsgR5A/zzHrjnWgMws7vKi7Kd0gvr2t/X393iAxvfUqT
> IGiSx+fq/bGB8uyTuQPFpaDRNMo7k2knzQzt4idSKz89tejWyimS71QdnmPWJP84
> OTnHUaGQdQamnAQqh5g3GC6XqS57apLQZx+7Y7WUpPjeX/+vQ2GtzuE=
> =RFjZ
> -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

I get the concept of volunteering just fine, I've been using Linux for
as long as I remember and I actually contributed to the Linux kernel
itself. Thank you very much.

Thing is, I use bitcoin-qt to get paid for work, and I'm not going to
put my hard earned money on random AUR packages for this.

The reason I trust the package from the repo is that I'm hoping I can
verify by signing them in some way, but there's no way I'm using some
random AUR package for this.

Diego