[arch-general] out of date packages - an observation

[Jelle van der Waa]

On 09/07/16 at 11:51am, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
> 
> After the recent dicsussion(s) around this topic I thought it
> worthwhile to go through where things stand.
> 
> I went through all the packages flagged out of date on the website
> and focused on what I viewed as the "more important" ones (this is IMHO
>  of course ... I'm sure others have differnt views). Regardless of how
>  out of date a package is, if a new package was in testing I did not
> include it here.

Not sure what you are trying to achieve with this email, but it's
actually a bit worse. We have 189 (i686/x86_64 included) packages which
are out of date for more than 30 days in our repos.

Then again I don't have any historical data of how many out of date
packages we usually have.


-- 
Jelle van der Waa
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20160908/f1c5095f/attachment.asc>