[arch-general] out of date packages - an observation

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Thu, 08 Sep 2016 10:27:23 -0400, Genes Lists via arch-general wrote:
>On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 10:15 +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
>> Not sure what you are trying to achieve with this email, but it's  
>
>My point was just that by focussing on the more important packages, it
>seems to me Arch is doing pretty well in my view - the glass is half
>full so to speak.

IMO your intention was unambiguous :).