[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Changing compilation flags
Jordan Glover
Golden_Miller83 at protonmail.ch
Fri Jul 7 13:39:27 UTC 2017
FYI clang devs don't want to take 1 line patch adding another no-op flag upstream.
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-July/054588.html
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] Changing compilation flags
> From: arch-dev-public at archlinux.org
> To: Evangelos Foutras <evangelos at foutrelis.com>
> Daniel Micay <danielmicay at gmail.com>, Public mailing list for Arch Linux development <arch-dev-public at archlinux.org>
> On 5 July 2017 at 19:51, Daniel Micay <danielmicay at gmail.com> wrote:
> So I think it would be a good idea to flip the default to -z,now in the
> linker if we"re going to use -fno-plt. I think they"d take a patch for
> that upstream. Clang issue could be avoided with a 1 line patch adding
> another no-op flag and they"d take that upstream. It"s harmless to use
> the slower lazy linking calling convention when -fno-plt is passed.
More information about the arch-general
mailing list